Manned missiles - cut the lights - pt. The manned missile; the story of the B-70. Digitizing sponsor Internet Archive. Prior owner's name on front pastedown. Jacket has a touch of edge wear, tears, and a bumped spine head. 17 Attraction Triggers Pdf. Manned Missiles CUT THE LIGHTS (SINGLE), released 21 December 2010 1. MANNED MISSILES - UNTITLED - PT. MANNED MISSILES - CUT THE LIGHTS - PT. Mark ReCupido said. This was a nice story/correspondence. I took from 'The Manned Missiles' at least two things. One is that politicians seem to be much more vengeful about dead countrymen than those countryman's parents. In this text, the Russian leader spoke badly of the American while the dead Russian's father wrote a letter speaking greatly of the American. This story also touches on an issue that Vonnegut discusses in 'Cat's Cradle.' This issue is nuclear proliferation, cosmic proliferation, and the proliferation of proliferation. ![]() I don't think that Vonnegut believes that there is anything wrong with proliferation and going out into space to seek knowledge (though Sirens of Titan suggest that we are exploring in the wrong direction.) He simply believes that we are insane in our competitiveness and irresponsibility. After all, in this story, the two men die because America sent a man into space to take knowledge that the Russians already attained; not to gain any new knowledge. Man is irresponsible in his rush to want to achieve this, and arrogance to want to achieve this first. Acer travelmate 2420 drivers. We all know that life is short, and we all want to know the answer to life before our life ends. However, in our hasty search of meaning, we ultimately make life shorter. A moral that many of Vonnegut's novels preach is that the meaning of life is a lot less important than we imagine; even non-existent. If this is true, we're going nowhere fast. Then again, what is the point, really? All man accomplishes is a proliferation of human life. We spend our whole life reproducing and making life 'better.' Politics, the entertainment industry, the FDA. All of these things do one thing: make man's stay on earth more comfortable. And when not destroying the world, we're protecting and recovering the world from our own destruction. When people change the world, they only do so in a negative manner. The ones who 'make a difference' in the world by picking up trash are merely undoing the difference that another human has already made. Not that there's anything wrong with that, and I'm no nihilist (to my knowledge.) I just believe that no ultimate purpose exists to human life other than to live, love, and die. I apologize, but I'd also like to make a comment regarding human life in 'Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow.' In that story, we get to the point where humans can't die. Which I outlined as one of man's tasks. Then, reproducing becomes pointless and irresponsible, which is arguably the other main purpose or goal of life. This is when the circle of life becomes the segment of life, and as we all know, all segments end. Or did I just blow your mind. Perhaps Vonnegut explains this better, and quite frankly, more clearly: 'I tell you, we are here on Earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you different.' Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to do just that.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |